<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Study in Sherlock</title>
	<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/</link>
	<description>random musings from a primate</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Adler</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110237</link>
		<author>Ms Adler</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 04:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110237</guid>
					<description>My husband and I (and my daughters too) have been usig your DIY Planner for a year now. We're looking forward to your new blog, since we are both closet Sherlockians, and can't wait to see what you come up with.

You've saved us lots of money, so we'd like to return the favor.  In recognition of your hard work on the DIY Planner we're sending you a little present we think you'll enjoy. It's the very least we can do for someone whose worked so hard and been so generous with so many people. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I (and my daughters too) have been usig your DIY Planner for a year now. We&#8217;re looking forward to your new blog, since we are both closet Sherlockians, and can&#8217;t wait to see what you come up with.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve saved us lots of money, so we&#8217;d like to return the favor.  In recognition of your hard work on the DIY Planner we&#8217;re sending you a little present we think you&#8217;ll enjoy. It&#8217;s the very least we can do for someone whose worked so hard and been so generous with so many people. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harris</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110241</link>
		<author>Sam Harris</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110241</guid>
					<description>One of our favourite sayings when we make blindingly obvious statements is "No s**t, Sherlock", example:

"That there DIY Planner is ruddy useful"
"No s**t, Sherlock"

Anyway, if you want to whet your appetite before diving in to a full multimedia blog, why not set up a Squidoo lens?  They're quite fun, as you might have seen on our lil' site recently.  I did one recently about &lt;a href="http://www.squidoo.com/slash" rel="nofollow"&gt;my pet obsession&lt;/a&gt; and it was quite a hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our favourite sayings when we make blindingly obvious statements is &#8220;No s**t, Sherlock&#8221;, example:</p>
<p>&#8220;That there DIY Planner is ruddy useful&#8221;<br />
&#8220;No s**t, Sherlock&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, if you want to whet your appetite before diving in to a full multimedia blog, why not set up a Squidoo lens?  They&#8217;re quite fun, as you might have seen on our lil&#8217; site recently.  I did one recently about <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/slash" rel="nofollow">my pet obsession</a> and it was quite a hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Carter, FCD</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110243</link>
		<author>Richard Carter, FCD</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110243</guid>
					<description>A Holmes weblog is a great idea. You have one guaranteed RSS subscriber already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Holmes weblog is a great idea. You have one guaranteed RSS subscriber already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110263</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110263</guid>
					<description>"Excellent, Watson!" or should I say "Johnston".

I too have been a follower of the exploits of the world first (only?) consulting detective since my mother, who I think had a penchant for Basil Rathbone, encouraged me to watch the early films.

For many years I was unaware of the true character of Watson until I began to read Conan Doyle's stories and since then I've been hooked.

I wrote to Sherlock Holmes in the seventies at his address in Baker Street in London and was pleasantly surprised to receive a reply from his secretary saying that the Great Detective was away on an important matter.

I subsequently became a member of the Sherlock Holmes Society of London and have collected a fair number of books, films and other material. I recently treated myself to the complete Jeremy Brett series of Holmes on DVD and my wife added to my collection of books with the third volume of Leslie Klinger's annotated Sherlock Holmes.

I don't profess to being a scholar either but it would be interesting to conjecture what he would have thought of the DIY Planner . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Excellent, Watson!&#8221; or should I say &#8220;Johnston&#8221;.</p>
<p>I too have been a follower of the exploits of the world first (only?) consulting detective since my mother, who I think had a penchant for Basil Rathbone, encouraged me to watch the early films.</p>
<p>For many years I was unaware of the true character of Watson until I began to read Conan Doyle&#8217;s stories and since then I&#8217;ve been hooked.</p>
<p>I wrote to Sherlock Holmes in the seventies at his address in Baker Street in London and was pleasantly surprised to receive a reply from his secretary saying that the Great Detective was away on an important matter.</p>
<p>I subsequently became a member of the Sherlock Holmes Society of London and have collected a fair number of books, films and other material. I recently treated myself to the complete Jeremy Brett series of Holmes on DVD and my wife added to my collection of books with the third volume of Leslie Klinger&#8217;s annotated Sherlock Holmes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t profess to being a scholar either but it would be interesting to conjecture what he would have thought of the DIY Planner . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Bongiovanni</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110264</link>
		<author>Ted Bongiovanni</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110264</guid>
					<description>I'm newly interested in Sherlock Holmes and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle just having finished reading &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/030726310X/sr=8-1/qid=1140785092/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-9692217-0005556?%5Fencoding=UTF8" rel="nofollow"&gt;Arthur and George&lt;/a&gt; by Julian Barnes.  Doyle seems like quite a character himself.  Also great that so many of his works are in the &lt;a href="http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/search?author=doyle+arthur+conan&#38;amode=start" rel="nofollow"&gt;public domain.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m newly interested in Sherlock Holmes and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle just having finished reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/030726310X/sr=8-1/qid=1140785092/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-9692217-0005556?%5Fencoding=UTF8" rel="nofollow">Arthur and George</a> by Julian Barnes.  Doyle seems like quite a character himself.  Also great that so many of his works are in the <a href="http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/search?author=doyle+arthur+conan&amp;amode=start" rel="nofollow">public domain.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hyde</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110439</link>
		<author>Robert Hyde</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110439</guid>
					<description>I always liked Arthur Conan Doyle's stories, but what i find interesting are the paintings his father did- fairy paintings and illustrations that reveal a vivid imagination. The father had what we might call a nervous breakdown or some type of mental disorder. In those days people were ashamed of such things and tried to hush them up. I'm sure this must have affected Arthur Conan Doyle greatly. The father's paintings ( I think his name was Richard) would probably be considered "outsider art" if he was alive today, or perhaps he'd be illustrating fantasty- fiction bookcovers today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always liked Arthur Conan Doyle&#8217;s stories, but what i find interesting are the paintings his father did- fairy paintings and illustrations that reveal a vivid imagination. The father had what we might call a nervous breakdown or some type of mental disorder. In those days people were ashamed of such things and tried to hush them up. I&#8217;m sure this must have affected Arthur Conan Doyle greatly. The father&#8217;s paintings ( I think his name was Richard) would probably be considered &#8220;outsider art&#8221; if he was alive today, or perhaps he&#8217;d be illustrating fantasty- fiction bookcovers today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougj</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110457</link>
		<author>dougj</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110457</guid>
					<description>Robert, I completely agree. The works are fascinating, and reveal much about his father (Charles Altamont Doyle) and his crumbling state of mind, and perhaps ACD's later fascination with fairies and spiritualism. For the new blog, there are three selections of his artwork from this phase in the queue. Amazing work, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I completely agree. The works are fascinating, and reveal much about his father (Charles Altamont Doyle) and his crumbling state of mind, and perhaps ACD&#8217;s later fascination with fairies and spiritualism. For the new blog, there are three selections of his artwork from this phase in the queue. Amazing work, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110550</link>
		<author>Russ</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2006/02/21/study-in-sherlock/#comment-110550</guid>
					<description>Douglas recently inquired on the HoundsL list about past messages.

Here is a link:

http://listserv.kent.edu/archives/hounds-l.html

Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas recently inquired on the HoundsL list about past messages.</p>
<p>Here is a link:</p>
<p><a href="http://listserv.kent.edu/archives/hounds-l.html" rel="nofollow">http://listserv.kent.edu/archives/hounds-l.html</a></p>
<p>Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
