<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Beginner&#8217;s Mind</title>
	<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/</link>
	<description>random musings from a primate</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Merlin</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14433</link>
		<author>Merlin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14433</guid>
					<description>Really enjoyed this (and as usual, I like your approach).

OT: I wonder if anyone else keeps looking at the line drawing above and seeing "Zen Family Circus" (complete with a Zen Jeffy). My once-beginnerly mind has clearly been polluted by Bil Keane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed this (and as usual, I like your approach).</p>
<p>OT: I wonder if anyone else keeps looking at the line drawing above and seeing &#8220;Zen Family Circus&#8221; (complete with a Zen Jeffy). My once-beginnerly mind has clearly been polluted by Bil Keane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foire aux idees &#187; Simplifier</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14448</link>
		<author>Foire aux idees &#187; Simplifier</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14448</guid>
					<description>[...] ut juste de lire quelques billets sur  l&#8217;art de simplifier les choses à faire (GTD, Beginner&#8217;s Mind), lorsque je suis tombé sur cette parution de To [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ut juste de lire quelques billets sur  l&#8217;art de simplifier les choses à faire (GTD, Beginner&#8217;s Mind), lorsque je suis tombé sur cette parution de To [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercurial</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14465</link>
		<author>Mercurial</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14465</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beginner's mind&lt;/strong&gt;

Zen mind Forget all. Be a beginner. Much of the personal turmoil that surrounds me can easily be traced to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beginner&#8217;s mind</strong></p>
<p>Zen mind Forget all. Be a beginner. Much of the personal turmoil that surrounds me can easily be traced to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lifehacker</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14507</link>
		<author>Lifehacker</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 14:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14507</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Approach your organization system with a beginner's mind&lt;/strong&gt;

Technologist Douglas Johnston says that to make his organization system effective, he had to strip it down, simplify and approach things with "a beginner's mind:" I had to leave this mind-clutter and baggage behind, at least temporarily, and forget ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Approach your organization system with a beginner&#8217;s mind</strong></p>
<p>Technologist Douglas Johnston says that to make his organization system effective, he had to strip it down, simplify and approach things with &#8220;a beginner&#8217;s mind:&#8221; I had to leave this mind-clutter and baggage behind, at least temporarily, and forget &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14579</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14579</guid>
					<description>I would also like to recommend a book titled The Art of Loving, by Erich Fromm. I have read it several times. What I have gained is an understanding of myself, of my fears and why we do what we do and think what we think. The book helps you gain humility, something we all lack in great quantities.

Be mindful--of yourself, of others. Turn off the TV. Sit silently and attempt to empty your mind. Do not pick up a magazine, or put something in your mouth. Try to gain a sense of I-ness. Now you may begin the task at hand.

When all your tasks seem daunting, and you'd rather list them over and over and assume your GTD system is to blame for all these problems, trust me, it's not to blame. You are afraid. It's okay, all people are afraid. Now you need to have faith. Faith in yourself, and in others. It will be hard at first, like a baby learning to walk. But over time your faith and courage will build. And when a new task, problem, obstacle faces you, you'll know what to do. You'll know just where to put it in that organization system. And the system will work, because it came from within, from your own motivations, rather than imposed from the outside, as an attempt to rationalize away your fears.

At least, that's how it's been for me, trying to GTD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to recommend a book titled The Art of Loving, by Erich Fromm. I have read it several times. What I have gained is an understanding of myself, of my fears and why we do what we do and think what we think. The book helps you gain humility, something we all lack in great quantities.</p>
<p>Be mindful&#8211;of yourself, of others. Turn off the TV. Sit silently and attempt to empty your mind. Do not pick up a magazine, or put something in your mouth. Try to gain a sense of I-ness. Now you may begin the task at hand.</p>
<p>When all your tasks seem daunting, and you&#8217;d rather list them over and over and assume your GTD system is to blame for all these problems, trust me, it&#8217;s not to blame. You are afraid. It&#8217;s okay, all people are afraid. Now you need to have faith. Faith in yourself, and in others. It will be hard at first, like a baby learning to walk. But over time your faith and courage will build. And when a new task, problem, obstacle faces you, you&#8217;ll know what to do. You&#8217;ll know just where to put it in that organization system. And the system will work, because it came from within, from your own motivations, rather than imposed from the outside, as an attempt to rationalize away your fears.</p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s been for me, trying to GTD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14621</link>
		<author>Tanner</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-14621</guid>
					<description>I really liked this, my own efforts have been haphazard of late. I will reflect on your system, it is attractive. It appeals to my desire to keep things simple, but no simpler than required, sort of a law of diminishing returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked this, my own efforts have been haphazard of late. I will reflect on your system, it is attractive. It appeals to my desire to keep things simple, but no simpler than required, sort of a law of diminishing returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dory</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-15059</link>
		<author>Dory</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-15059</guid>
					<description>Really enjoyed your article, have been there and back a number of times,.  I end up trashing as much as I dare and begin again, each time trying NOT to pile on the unnecessary but tempting extras.  I think it is part of my packrat mentality - the part that likes to collect things, just because..  Nothing like a good spring/fall cleaning of my house, desk, mind, etc.  The KISS principle can set you free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed your article, have been there and back a number of times,.  I end up trashing as much as I dare and begin again, each time trying NOT to pile on the unnecessary but tempting extras.  I think it is part of my packrat mentality - the part that likes to collect things, just because..  Nothing like a good spring/fall cleaning of my house, desk, mind, etc.  The KISS principle can set you free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas BRESSE</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-15521</link>
		<author>Thomas BRESSE</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-15521</guid>
					<description>Very good reading, simple is beautifull ! It's a nice way to rethink things you present here. I am building my system those days and I really think I need to keep things to the bare minimum. Ban duplicates, ditch what not needed, and have a good filing system to store everything. Being lazy myself, there's some things I do naturaly (never tracked my daily finances ;) ), but there's other things I should do which I don't for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good reading, simple is beautifull ! It&#8217;s a nice way to rethink things you present here. I am building my system those days and I really think I need to keep things to the bare minimum. Ban duplicates, ditch what not needed, and have a good filing system to store everything. Being lazy myself, there&#8217;s some things I do naturaly (never tracked my daily finances <img src='http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), but there&#8217;s other things I should do which I don&#8217;t for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productivity Hacks</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-31955</link>
		<author>Productivity Hacks</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-31955</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beginner's Mind&lt;/strong&gt;

Douglas Johnston over at "A million monkeys typing" has an intersting approach to organization and GTD. The Beginner’s Mind: "Often we must come full circle –to return to the very beginning– in the efforts to renew ourselves. To do this,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beginner&#8217;s Mind</strong></p>
<p>Douglas Johnston over at &#8220;A million monkeys typing&#8221; has an intersting approach to organization and GTD. The Beginner’s Mind: &#8220;Often we must come full circle –to return to the very beginning– in the efforts to renew ourselves. To do this,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rib</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47620</link>
		<author>rib</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47620</guid>
					<description>&lt;!-- spamk    : Comment text: 'Provocative post! But it put my mind to critique, thinking that truly getting organized works best in a closed system, one with boundaries. Something can't be empty unless it's a container. Air, for instance, isn't empty. Water isn't empty. You cannot organize air or water unless you contain it.  You can empty the air from a tire (a closed system) or the water from a bucket (a container). 

But, at the root, however, do we try to organize ourselves as the closed system we really are? I don't think so. Rather, we organize our little ponds because we are goaded on by oceanic expansion. We want more...and more. We are closed tires who want to be unboundaried atmospheres. 

As a student of my own mistakenness, I've always erred in past by using organizing as a way to "make room" for even more stuff to organize! "Oh look! Now that I'm organized I can take up yoga, spend more timing on business planning, learn French, floss everyday, do X, Y, and Z!"  This is an "organic" system of proliferation, of growth, of expansion. The problem is that it demands ever more discipline, study, and vigilence to maintain the pre-existing organizational system. The acquisition mania, whether for things or things to do, goes untreated. 

So, like, the vilest temptation arising after a thorough cleaning and tidying of one half of our two-car garage, is the seductive thought of a second car. Filling up the container like this stressing the organizational system. 

The approach I'm trying to take now combines some simple GTD "containers" with attempts to reduce of the number of things contained. If empty mind is truly the peace we seek then the best outcome of the organization effort should not be freedom to do more things with our time, but the freedom to do less. 

Empty mind would have it that there is nothing to organize. Ultimately, of course, I will fail. But in our epoch of accelerating amassments, I'd venture that we need to recognize "reduction" as a mission-critical synonym for "simplicity". 

The ultimate end here would be just to sit, like Buddha, then sit some more. 

rib



Getting simple ' matched ((holdem&#124;texas&#124;poker&#124;casino&#124;online&#124;gambl&#124;blackjack&#124;game&#124;free).*){2,} --&gt;







Provocative post! But it put my mind to critique, thinking that truly getting organized works best in a closed system, one with boundaries. Something can't be empty unless it's a container. Air, for instance, isn't empty. Water isn't empty. You cannot organize air or water unless you contain it.  You can empty the air from a tire (a closed system) or the water from a bucket (a container). 

But, at the root, however, do we try to organize ourselves as the closed system we really are? I don't think so. Rather, we organize our little ponds because we are goaded on by oceanic expansion. We want more...and more. We are closed tires who want to be unboundaried atmospheres. 

As a student of my own mistakenness, I've always erred in past by using organizing as a way to "make room" for even more stuff to organize! "Oh look! Now that I'm organized I can take up yoga, spend more timing on business planning, learn French, floss everyday, do X, Y, and Z!"  This is an "organic" system of proliferation, of growth, of expansion. The problem is that it demands ever more discipline, study, and vigilence to maintain the pre-existing organizational system. The acquisition mania, whether for things or things to do, goes untreated. 

So, like, the vilest temptation arising after a thorough cleaning and tidying of one half of our two-car garage, is the seductive thought of a second car. Filling up the container like this stressing the organizational system. 

The approach I'm trying to take now combines some simple GTD "containers" with attempts to reduce of the number of things contained. If empty mind is truly the peace we seek then the best outcome of the organization effort should not be freedom to do more things with our time, but the freedom to do less. 

Empty mind would have it that there is nothing to organize. Ultimately, of course, I will fail. But in our epoch of accelerating amassments, I'd venture that we need to recognize "reduction" as a mission-critical synonym for "simplicity". 

The ultimate end here would be just to sit, like Buddha, then sit some more. 

rib



Getting simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- spamk    : Comment text: 'Provocative post! But it put my mind to critique, thinking that truly getting organized works best in a closed system, one with boundaries. Something can't be empty unless it's a container. Air, for instance, isn't empty. Water isn't empty. You cannot organize air or water unless you contain it.  You can empty the air from a tire (a closed system) or the water from a bucket (a container). </p>
<p>But, at the root, however, do we try to organize ourselves as the closed system we really are? I don't think so. Rather, we organize our little ponds because we are goaded on by oceanic expansion. We want more...and more. We are closed tires who want to be unboundaried atmospheres. </p>
<p>As a student of my own mistakenness, I've always erred in past by using organizing as a way to "make room" for even more stuff to organize! "Oh look! Now that I'm organized I can take up yoga, spend more timing on business planning, learn French, floss everyday, do X, Y, and Z!"  This is an "organic" system of proliferation, of growth, of expansion. The problem is that it demands ever more discipline, study, and vigilence to maintain the pre-existing organizational system. The acquisition mania, whether for things or things to do, goes untreated. </p>
<p>So, like, the vilest temptation arising after a thorough cleaning and tidying of one half of our two-car garage, is the seductive thought of a second car. Filling up the container like this stressing the organizational system. </p>
<p>The approach I'm trying to take now combines some simple GTD "containers" with attempts to reduce of the number of things contained. If empty mind is truly the peace we seek then the best outcome of the organization effort should not be freedom to do more things with our time, but the freedom to do less. </p>
<p>Empty mind would have it that there is nothing to organize. Ultimately, of course, I will fail. But in our epoch of accelerating amassments, I'd venture that we need to recognize "reduction" as a mission-critical synonym for "simplicity". </p>
<p>The ultimate end here would be just to sit, like Buddha, then sit some more. </p>
<p>rib</p>
<p>Getting simple ' matched ((holdem|texas|poker|casino|online|gambl|blackjack|game|free).*){2,} --></p>
<p>Provocative post! But it put my mind to critique, thinking that truly getting organized works best in a closed system, one with boundaries. Something can&#8217;t be empty unless it&#8217;s a container. Air, for instance, isn&#8217;t empty. Water isn&#8217;t empty. You cannot organize air or water unless you contain it.  You can empty the air from a tire (a closed system) or the water from a bucket (a container). </p>
<p>But, at the root, however, do we try to organize ourselves as the closed system we really are? I don&#8217;t think so. Rather, we organize our little ponds because we are goaded on by oceanic expansion. We want more&#8230;and more. We are closed tires who want to be unboundaried atmospheres. </p>
<p>As a student of my own mistakenness, I&#8217;ve always erred in past by using organizing as a way to &#8220;make room&#8221; for even more stuff to organize! &#8220;Oh look! Now that I&#8217;m organized I can take up yoga, spend more timing on business planning, learn French, floss everyday, do X, Y, and Z!&#8221;  This is an &#8220;organic&#8221; system of proliferation, of growth, of expansion. The problem is that it demands ever more discipline, study, and vigilence to maintain the pre-existing organizational system. The acquisition mania, whether for things or things to do, goes untreated. </p>
<p>So, like, the vilest temptation arising after a thorough cleaning and tidying of one half of our two-car garage, is the seductive thought of a second car. Filling up the container like this stressing the organizational system. </p>
<p>The approach I&#8217;m trying to take now combines some simple GTD &#8220;containers&#8221; with attempts to reduce of the number of things contained. If empty mind is truly the peace we seek then the best outcome of the organization effort should not be freedom to do more things with our time, but the freedom to do less. </p>
<p>Empty mind would have it that there is nothing to organize. Ultimately, of course, I will fail. But in our epoch of accelerating amassments, I&#8217;d venture that we need to recognize &#8220;reduction&#8221; as a mission-critical synonym for &#8220;simplicity&#8221;. </p>
<p>The ultimate end here would be just to sit, like Buddha, then sit some more. </p>
<p>rib</p>
<p>Getting simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougj</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47621</link>
		<author>dougj</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47621</guid>
					<description>rib, &lt;em&gt;great&lt;/em&gt; comment. I certainly agree with the need to use discipline and a closed system to get things done. I've read that Zen monks go through hours of Zazen (sitting meditation), but one of the inherent problems is the high risk of falling asleep. That is why there is a monk delegated to the task of roaming with a stick (sorry, I forget the title). If one of the monks is in danger of drifting off, he or she asks the roamer for a quick whack with the stick. To me, that &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; discipline, and demonstrates the need to use external methods to focus, not to mention that the often rigid lifestyle of a monk seems to indicate a fairly closed system to work within.

What I advocate here is not to exist in a perpetual state of "Beginner's Mind", sitting like Buddha beneath the bodhi tree --this is not practical for most of us-- but rather a need to clear away the clutter and return to our original face, free from the baggage of a thousand different ways to handle our lives. We need to start there, again, I believe, and try to see what our life and situation actually demand. It's essentially starting from point zero, then building up the system and discipline to face things effectively. Hopefully, that will amount in a significant reduction in one's convoluted and complex organisational strategies, one that is far more simple and more intuitively followed within our imposed boundries. Defying those temptations to "fill the container" (an excellent metaphor) is an ongoing struggle, but one that should be much easier given the occasional return to the Beginner's Mind and its wiping of the board: the question ultimately to be answered is, "What do I really need?"

dj
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rib, <em>great</em> comment. I certainly agree with the need to use discipline and a closed system to get things done. I&#8217;ve read that Zen monks go through hours of Zazen (sitting meditation), but one of the inherent problems is the high risk of falling asleep. That is why there is a monk delegated to the task of roaming with a stick (sorry, I forget the title). If one of the monks is in danger of drifting off, he or she asks the roamer for a quick whack with the stick. To me, that <em>is</em> discipline, and demonstrates the need to use external methods to focus, not to mention that the often rigid lifestyle of a monk seems to indicate a fairly closed system to work within.</p>
<p>What I advocate here is not to exist in a perpetual state of &#8220;Beginner&#8217;s Mind&#8221;, sitting like Buddha beneath the bodhi tree &#8211;this is not practical for most of us&#8211; but rather a need to clear away the clutter and return to our original face, free from the baggage of a thousand different ways to handle our lives. We need to start there, again, I believe, and try to see what our life and situation actually demand. It&#8217;s essentially starting from point zero, then building up the system and discipline to face things effectively. Hopefully, that will amount in a significant reduction in one&#8217;s convoluted and complex organisational strategies, one that is far more simple and more intuitively followed within our imposed boundries. Defying those temptations to &#8220;fill the container&#8221; (an excellent metaphor) is an ongoing struggle, but one that should be much easier given the occasional return to the Beginner&#8217;s Mind and its wiping of the board: the question ultimately to be answered is, &#8220;What do I really need?&#8221;</p>
<p>dj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusmedia 2.0</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47678</link>
		<author>lotusmedia 2.0</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-47678</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;GTD + Basecamp = ???&lt;/strong&gt;

	I am trying to use this trendy, new-ish organizational methodology called Getting Things Done (GTD).  It&#8217;s been growing in popularity among geeks that I respect.  I first discovered it through 43 Folders, a really great site for Macintosh and GT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GTD + Basecamp = ???</strong></p>
<p>	I am trying to use this trendy, new-ish organizational methodology called Getting Things Done (GTD).  It&#8217;s been growing in popularity among geeks that I respect.  I first discovered it through 43 Folders, a really great site for Macintosh and GT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the evans center for sleep deprivation studies</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-81311</link>
		<author>the evans center for sleep deprivation studies</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-81311</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;actually getting things done&lt;/strong&gt;

 I'm always overcommitted. Have been for years. So when the geekosphere started getting excited about David Allen's Getting Things Done, I sort of watched from afar with curiosity. I finally read the book, and spent some time thinking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>actually getting things done</strong></p>
<p> I&#8217;m always overcommitted. Have been for years. So when the geekosphere started getting excited about David Allen&#8217;s Getting Things Done, I sort of watched from afar with curiosity. I finally read the book, and spent some time thinking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-92037</link>
		<author>Jon Rutherford</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-92037</guid>
					<description>As Zen Buddhism has been the chief influence on my life and thought, such as they are, since 1975, I was pleased to see the word "Zen" used in a way that for once did not cheapen it.  

Very interesting article, which I stumbled upon while researching how I might return to paper data-keeping in view of perhaps having to abandon my longstanding Palm handheld usage.  
I've always taken more pleasure in using a fountain pen than in using a palmtop, so I guess in a sense I'm halfway there.  

I haven't had a chance to read all the comments here, so perhaps somebody has recommended the classic "Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind" of Shunryu Suzuki Roshi.  It was my first "serious" introduction to the Zen way of living.  I like it so well I've read it, I think, four times, and I keep a photo of Suzuki Roshi in my living room.  

Thanks for a most interesting site that I'm tickled to have discovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Zen Buddhism has been the chief influence on my life and thought, such as they are, since 1975, I was pleased to see the word &#8220;Zen&#8221; used in a way that for once did not cheapen it.  </p>
<p>Very interesting article, which I stumbled upon while researching how I might return to paper data-keeping in view of perhaps having to abandon my longstanding Palm handheld usage.<br />
I&#8217;ve always taken more pleasure in using a fountain pen than in using a palmtop, so I guess in a sense I&#8217;m halfway there.  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to read all the comments here, so perhaps somebody has recommended the classic &#8220;Zen Mind, Beginner&#8217;s Mind&#8221; of Shunryu Suzuki Roshi.  It was my first &#8220;serious&#8221; introduction to the Zen way of living.  I like it so well I&#8217;ve read it, I think, four times, and I keep a photo of Suzuki Roshi in my living room.  </p>
<p>Thanks for a most interesting site that I&#8217;m tickled to have discovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Alterity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Back To Productivity Basics</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-153144</link>
		<author>Digital Alterity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Back To Productivity Basics</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-153144</guid>
					<description>[...] Do you find that all manner of productivity fads and tools enter your life and you just recreate the same level of stress? Do you find yourself focussing on the system rather than the items you&#8217;re supposed to be working on and getting off of your mind? This article by Douglas Johnston might help you get back the absolute basics: I released that my biggest problem was trying to contain all the information, constantly trying to shape an unnatural flow as one might attempt to contain or change the course of a river with only one’s bare hands. Time after time, this caused my tension and frustration to build to the point of needing to abandon my fledgeling systems. You see, my cherished systems were the result of my accumulated knowledge and many years’ experience in IT work; they had become a series of intellectual challenges, and not a natural way of looking at or managing my life. I had to leave this mind-clutter and baggage behind, at least temporarily, and forget about my unholy communions of wikis, web-based project management tools, PDAs, server-synced calendars, sitebars, databases and 20-step flowcharts (Read more). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Do you find that all manner of productivity fads and tools enter your life and you just recreate the same level of stress? Do you find yourself focussing on the system rather than the items you&#8217;re supposed to be working on and getting off of your mind? This article by Douglas Johnston might help you get back the absolute basics: I released that my biggest problem was trying to contain all the information, constantly trying to shape an unnatural flow as one might attempt to contain or change the course of a river with only one’s bare hands. Time after time, this caused my tension and frustration to build to the point of needing to abandon my fledgeling systems. You see, my cherished systems were the result of my accumulated knowledge and many years’ experience in IT work; they had become a series of intellectual challenges, and not a natural way of looking at or managing my life. I had to leave this mind-clutter and baggage behind, at least temporarily, and forget about my unholy communions of wikis, web-based project management tools, PDAs, server-synced calendars, sitebars, databases and 20-step flowcharts (Read more). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Preserve Your State of Mind &#124; MonkAtWork.com</title>
		<link>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-154493</link>
		<author>How To Preserve Your State of Mind &#124; MonkAtWork.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://douglasjohnston.net/weblog/archives/2005/06/27/beginners-mind/#comment-154493</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;m asking of you: Be vigilant about your state of mind today. Place the sanctity of your own mental coherence above habitual patterns of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m asking of you: Be vigilant about your state of mind today. Place the sanctity of your own mental coherence above habitual patterns of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
